In this article we will list out the common types of prompt injection attacks that are usually low hanging fruit from a testing perspective. These tests can be used to make sure any AI tool using LLM models has some amount of basic security and filtering built in.
Prompt injection attacks exploit vulnerabilities in natural language processing (NLP) models by manipulating the input to influence the model’s behavior.
Common prompt injection attack patterns include:
1. Direct Command Injection: Crafting inputs that directly give the model a command, attempting to hijack the intended instruction.
2. Instruction Reversal: Adding instructions that tell the model to ignore or reverse previous commands.
3. Role-Based Deception: Pretending to be a trusted entity to trick the model into revealing information or acting on malicious instructions.
4. Masking as User Input: Injecting commands within user data fields that are meant to be processed by the system.
5. Context Manipulation: Adding misleading or malicious instructions within valid input to alter the context the model perceives.
6. Exploiting Conditional Statements: Posing questions or statements that make the model act under conditional logic, overriding previous instructions.
7. Confusion Attacks: Adding contradictory or ambiguous instructions to confuse the model and make it expose unintended outputs.
8. Multi-Step Manipulation: Using a sequence of steps that, when followed, lead to unintended behavior or disclosure.
9. Using Social Engineering Techniques: Crafting requests that appear legitimate or benign but subtly direct the model to leak information.
10. Chained Injection: Combining multiple small injections to bypass filters, such as breaking the attack into pieces that are executed over time.
11. Data Injection in Input Fields: Inputting commands into fields where the model expects non-instructional data, like filling a username or email field with a prompt.
12. Exploiting Defaults and Fallbacks: Using ambiguous instructions that rely on the model’s fallback or default behavior to get unintended outputs.
13. Code Injection in Dynamic Content: Placing code or executable scripts within prompts in dynamic web or interactive contexts.
By identifying and preventing these prompt injection patterns, developers can enhance the security of NLP systems. This is a very good reason to discover. Monitor and control data flowing to these AI systems. Data Flow Posture Management is purpose built for these types of use cases.